Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CRU hacked: Climategate?
#61
Falsifications of NZ data discovered.
Sanders 2020

Reply
#62
mv Wrote:Falsifications of NZ data discovered.

The bad news for alarmists is spreading,their data manipulation are getting exposed FAST!

I got that from a scientist two days ago before it was even widely posted on the net and I was astonished at the great lengths at the manipulation.The jerks tried so hard to make the cooling go away and to elevate non existing warming in its place.They are scum and deserve all the ridicule they can get.

Alarmists are now quickly losing any credibility (what little there ever was) with their lies,deception and manipulation of legitimate science.I wish they get fired and be replaced with people who are into sober science research and resist the political and environmentalist propaganda,that swirls around them.
Reply
#63
It's like one huge incestuous relationship, that you can find in the hills of appalachia, or the back woods of Kentucky, or Arkansas. They are all having informational sex with each other, and don't want any outsiders to come in and gum up the works.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply
#64
The Telegraph.

Also: information sex? LMAO... but there is more to climatic sex.
Sanders 2020

Reply
#65
From the telegraph link:

Quote:Senator James Inhofe’s Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works has written to all the relevant US Government agencies, acquainting them with the nature of the e-mails.

Good for you!

S1
Reply
#66
Here's some study data showing there isn't even a warming trend,you can imagine these guys got the attacks of the religious earth worshippers:


HERE
Reply
#67
It's a Real Shame Michael Crichton could not have lived longer, and been able to write a nice novel about this latest Cluster Foxtrot.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply
#68
Penn State to Investigate Mann?

Oh Mann... this sucks S2

sunsettommy Wrote:I wish they get fired and be replaced with people

Disagreement. These people caused considerably heavier damage than Osama or KSM. A corresponding penalty should apply.

------

Also, more Telegraph: the worst scientific scandal of our generation .
Sanders 2020

Reply
#69
Just a few more for those that are interested:

20 November
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesd...l-warming/
http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2...gs-33.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/scienc....html?_r=2
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppa...-media-mum

21 November
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17102
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17102
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...93_pf.html
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-9111-...?#comments

22 November
http://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/article5...sg_comment
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/11...mails.html
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/technolog...story.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...86_pf.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009...nrave.html

23 November
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environ...ation.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ptics.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html
http://diepresse.com/home/techscience/in...do?_vl_bac.. informiert:
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2009/11/...-carbonic/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125883405294859215.html
http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsid...-hack.html

24 November
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andre...nalyising/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424...bs=article
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17183
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/24/...1180.shtml
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/fea...5802504484
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis...?id=513436


25 November
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/ge...s-response


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/gerald...rade-laws/

26 November
http://klimakatastrophe.wordpress.com/20...ien-teil2/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424...68360.html
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs...ience.aspx
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesd...ll-moment/

27 November
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17294
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424...lenews_wsj
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con...03608.html
http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/peer-2...imate.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenha...egate.html
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/357/


Oh, OK - it's quite a few more!

S1
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
Reply
#70
Uh Oh!

This is not good, if true:

Climate change data dumped

From the article:

Quote:SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

And, remember, this it the primary organization that was providing these "predictions of global warming" to the UN's IPCC.
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
Reply
#71
mv Wrote:------

Also, more Telegraph: the worst scientific scandal of our generation .

He's correct: the biggest since Piltdown. And even bigger than that.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply
#72
And more:

Vincent Gray on Climategate: ‘There Was Proof of Fraud All Along’ (PJM Exclusive)

Unbelievable!

The same data was used by two different groups of scientists, both of which included Wang and Karl, to develop two different papers:

One that provides evidence that urban change has no influence on temperatures and the other paper provides evidence that urban change does have influence on temperatures.

How can this be?

Easy, when you have your "buddy group" doing the peer review.

The fraud is obvious.

Worse, one of these papers is primary to IPCC's stand on urban change not having any influence on the temperature measurements.


"All the facts are in, the science is settled, there is a consensus." - I don't think so!
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
Reply
#73
This isnt a political cartoon, or a "funny pic", so I might as well put it here.
[Image: peer-review.jpg]
Different eyes see different things. Different hearts beat on different strings.
But there are times for you and me when all such things agree.
-Geddy Lee, Rush.
Reply
#74
[Image: 747.gif]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply
#75
Steyn on this comedy
Reply
#76
Steyn describes the "peer review" corruption excellently.

So, can we call the people who have been duped "dupid"?
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
Reply
#77
JohnWho Wrote:Steyn describes the "peer review" corruption excellently.

So, can we call the people who have been duped "dupid"?

My G-d, I really like that one. S6
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply
#78
Does anyone, for a moment, believe this statement.

Quote:There is "virtually no possibility" of a few scientists biasing the advice given to governments by the UN's top global warming body, its chair said today.
---

"The processes in the IPCC are so robust, so inclusive, that even if an author or two has a particular bias it is completely unlikely that bias will find its way into the IPCC report,"

Does this not totally destroy the scientific process? I thought 'peer review' was the way scientific evidence was applied and reviewed.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply
#79
John L, that Al Gore Melting cartoon is a classic!
Reply
#80
Ron Lambert Wrote:John L, that Al Gore Melting cartoon is a classic!

If his deceit and dishonesty weren't so serious, I would also enjoy it. Unfortunately, he is a crook, and should be treated accordingly.

In fact, his offspring should be sterilized(since he has already spread his seed), so as not to be able to pass along his defective genes to humanity.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it" - Jonathan Swift, 1710
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Exclamation Climategate II (more CRU emails) JohnWho 20 9,189 02-09-2017, 07:02 PM
Last Post: John L

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)