Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Suicide.
#21
scpg02 Wrote:
Biker Dude Wrote:
eaglestrikes Wrote:
Biker Dude Wrote:Who is 'The Muslim'? :?:
BHO
Oh, I get it. You name a man that has chosen to worship in the same place as the mighty GWB simply because his name sounds funny. How cute. Unoriginal, but slightly cute.

I think those who believe he is Christian are less than those who believe he is Muslim.
Dependence on making 'dirty Muslims' evil is the bogey man of the small mind. And since America is still a semi free country, people should feel free to openly demonstrate their ignorance for all to see as much as possible. I applaud this, as it unmasks the useful idiots for what they are, simpletons.

Obama is first and foremost a politician. Protestations otherwise need some demonstrate able proof to be taken seriously. Absolutely nothing has ever been demonstrated that he is more muslim than christian, making followers of this brainless belief true dumb sheep.
[Image: SalmaHayekcopy.jpg]
Reply
#22
scpg02 Wrote:I think those who believe he is Christian are less than those who believe he is Muslim.

I'm having a problem believing he is either.
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!
Reply
#23
WmLambert Wrote:Personally, I think he is more Socialist-Marxist, and uses religion pragmatically.
Might have been a business socialist in his early years, never close to that elitits Jew though, but sold his soul to the devil special interests long ago.
"You know, Paul, Reagan proved that deficits don't matter." Dick Cheney
Reply
#24
eaglestrikes Wrote:
Buzz Wrote:No... most states went to Obama! Look for yourself.
This link reflects the problem with Wick, Inaccurate.

How is this Wiki link inaccurate? Is there something wrong with their map of how the states voted? Oh... and don't just tell me it is wrong... prove it!
The rightist motto: "Facts?... we don't need no stinkin facts."

[Image: Obama08_Logo150.gif]
Reply
#25
Biker Dude Wrote:
eaglestrikes Wrote:
Biker Dude Wrote:Who is 'The Muslim'? :?:
BHO
Oh, I get it. You name a man that has chosen to worship in the same place as the mighty GWB simply because his name sounds funny. How cute. Unoriginal, but slightly cute.
Was I up for some kind of Award for doing what others think is right? I lost it eh? A PC Award so to speak.
Well so it goes.
I named him 'The Muslim'
A. Because I can.
B. Because he is.
C Because he has shown affinity for them over all others.

However thank you for sharing your rather un-original comment with all of us.
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government
Edward Abbey
[Image: eagle_1721.png]
Reply
#26
Buzz Wrote:
eaglestrikes Wrote:
Buzz Wrote:No... most states went to Obama! Look for yourself.
This link reflects the problem with Wick, Inaccurate.

How is this Wiki link inaccurate? Is there something wrong with their map of how the states voted? Oh... and don't just tell me it is wrong... prove it!
Wick is inaccurate. That is well documented. The proof already exist. You need only remove the Liberal Blinders to see it. As has been said previously, you are in denial.
Since the preponderance of the evidence shows Wick to be inaccurate you go the extra mile and show that it is.
Are you under the impression that your words have significance?
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government
Edward Abbey
[Image: eagle_1721.png]
Reply
#27
BTW, the maps showed county-by-county endorsement. From the very beginning, the point was made that fewer areas that had higher populations was the deciding factor.

I would like to see a map weighted by those who earn their own way, as opposed to those who live off the Nanny-state.

Early arguments of how the vote should be taken played with only property-holders having a vote, defeated by Benjamin Franklin's debate (Reductio ad Absurdum):
Quote:You say I should own -property in order to vote; supposing I own a jackass, I then own property and thus I can vote. But suppose I sell the jackass; I no longer own property, and therefore I cannot vote. Thus, the vote represents not me but the jackass."

The famous two-thirds vote was an appeasement to slave owners to prevent corrupted votes by slave-owners voting in lieu of their slaves.

Poll Taxes were often abused - but makes a point. If a voter must pass a voting proficiency test to prove he is voting by choice rather than by random guess, then the elected would need to stand on issues rather than in similarity of names.

Heinlein had it right. Voting is a privilege that should be earned.
Reply
#28
WmLambert Wrote:I would like to see a map weighted by those who earn their own way, as opposed to those who live off the Nanny-state.

I believe everyone here, with the exception of Buzz, is aware that metropolitan areas having the greatest amount of corruption, poverty, and ineptness, are all run by a political 'machine' having Jackasses at the helm.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it.
H. L. Mencken
Reply
#29
eaglestrikes Wrote:Was I up for some kind of Award for doing what others think is right? I lost it eh? A PC Award so to speak.
Well so it goes.
I named him 'The Muslim'
A. Because I can.
B. Because he is.
C Because he has shown affinity for them over all others.

However thank you for sharing your rather un-original comment with all of us.
An award? Uh, yeah right, you were. But I told John I would play nice.

I like how all you could think of was using the same comment I did. Ah Irony, your name is eaglestrikes. Notice how my comment was on your unoriginality? And you then copied it? Being further unoriginal? :lol: Thanks for the entertainment!
[Image: SalmaHayekcopy.jpg]
Reply
#30
Buzz Wrote:The number of states that went to Democrats and republican are way off. I'll bet there is no link because its all a bunch of right wing BS.

You people are such suckers for misinformation.
What does it matter if the kooks rule the open spaces, they'll never win the cities. Demographics is working against them. In the cities, with limited space, there are of course some rules of civilized social behaviour necessary and represented by the democrats, which the one bible and gun toting loonie per squaremile of waste lands can neglect.
"You know, Paul, Reagan proved that deficits don't matter." Dick Cheney
Reply
#31
Biker Dude Wrote:
eaglestrikes Wrote:Was I up for some kind of Award for doing what others think is right? I lost it eh? A PC Award so to speak.
Well so it goes.
I named him 'The Muslim'
A. Because I can.
B. Because he is.
C Because he has shown affinity for them over all others.

However thank you for sharing your rather un-original comment with all of us.
An award? Uh, yeah right, you were. But I told John I would play nice.

I like how all you could think of was using the same comment I did. Ah Irony, your name is eaglestrikes. Notice how my comment was on your unoriginality? And you then copied it? Being further unoriginal? :lol: Thanks for the entertainment!

Nice of you. What award do you think you would have received in return.

You provide your opinion, I will provide mine. I always oppose censorship no matter who tries to impose it.
I also will also play nice.
You comment on what I say, I reply to it. At whatever level you want.
You decide the next step.
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government
Edward Abbey
[Image: eagle_1721.png]
Reply
#32
quadrat Wrote:
Buzz Wrote:The number of states that went to Democrats and republican are way off. I'll bet there is no link because its all a bunch of right wing BS.

You people are such suckers for misinformation.
What does it matter if the kooks rule the open spaces, they'll never win the cities. Demographics is working against them. In the cities, with limited space, there are of course some rules of civilized social behaviour necessary and represented by the democrats, which the one bible and gun toting loonie per squaremile of waste lands can neglect.
Who you picking for a winner in the Rose Bowl?
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government
Edward Abbey
[Image: eagle_1721.png]
Reply
#33
eaglestrikes Wrote:
quadrat Wrote:
Buzz Wrote:The number of states that went to Democrats and republican are way off. I'll bet there is no link because its all a bunch of right wing BS.

You people are such suckers for misinformation.
What does it matter if the kooks rule the open spaces, they'll never win the cities. Demographics is working against them. In the cities, with limited space, there are of course some rules of civilized social behaviour necessary and represented by the democrats, which the one bible and gun toting loonie per squaremile of waste lands can neglect.
Who you picking for a winner in the Rose Bowl?

I donn no, but I do no who isn't going to win the Soul Bowl.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
All men are frauds. The only difference between them is that some admit it. I myself deny it.
H. L. Mencken
Reply
#34
eaglestrikes Wrote:
Buzz Wrote:
eaglestrikes Wrote:
Buzz Wrote:No... most states went to Obama! Look for yourself.
This link reflects the problem with Wick, Inaccurate.

How is this Wiki link inaccurate? Is there something wrong with their map of how the states voted? Oh... and don't just tell me it is wrong... prove it!
Wick is inaccurate. That is well documented. The proof already exist. You need only remove the Liberal Blinders to see it. As has been said previously, you are in denial.
Since the preponderance of the evidence shows Wick to be inaccurate you go the extra mile and show that it is.
Are you under the impression that your words have significance?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

I knew you wouldn't prove a damn thing... and you say I am in denial?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Look... if you think Wikipedia is such a unreliable source then why don't you go and actually do your own research and prove me wrong? You are capable of doing your own research aren't you? This information is readily available from a number of different sources. Or have you already checked this out elsewhere and found I am correct and this is why you have resorted to this idiotic deflection.

You people are a bunch of nut jobs. jt posts some obviously false information and none of you guys can even bring yourselves to admit that some of it is wrong. All you people can come up with is ad-hominem attacks and straw man arguments that don't prove anything.

Oh... and if you apply the same standards to right wing media that you are applying to Wikipedia then every thing the right says must be BS as well. Documented cases of falsehoods from the right are much more numerous than any Wiki documented falsehoods. And yes, my words do have significance because unlike you I can back them up.
The rightist motto: "Facts?... we don't need no stinkin facts."

[Image: Obama08_Logo150.gif]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)