Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mueller Investigation: Is It Coming Off The Rails?
#1
My Lord, what a Mess! Does anyone actually believe that justice will be served here? And is the entire investigation going to be shut down for its partisan political agenda?

I know Hannity has gathered forces in order to bring it all down. I wonder if it will be enough.

Hannity: Mueller investigation is epitome of the DC swamp


___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#2
Hannity did a good job of succinctly exposing the issues in a way that just can't be refuted.

He did leave out Mueller's connections to Uranium One, and his coverups in the past that allowed Democrats to skate.
Reply
#3
One thing Dick Morris is happy about is the replacement of the original General Flynn judge, with Emmett Sullivan, who may likely take over the entire Uranium One, Russian Collusion, and Mueller investigation process. Granted, he is a Clinton appointee, but if he is anything like what Dick Morris says, he may well be great news.

VERY Good Judge Named To Handle Flynn Sentencing! Dick Morris TV: Lunch ALERT!


___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#4
Here's the latest Cluster Foxtrot coming from the Mueller Investigation.

Digging Ugly Holes – Robert Mueller Team Illegally Obtained Trump Transition Team Emails…

It appears that Mueller skirted the rules/law when he went around the administration, and collected all of the WH emails without telling them.  This is just one more egg on his face, from what I can tell.

Sundance urges caution on this report because........

Quote:....In this case, the reported action by the SC team took place in August 2017, four or five months ago.  Inside that exact same timeline, on August 16th 2017, FBI Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Attorney Lisa Page were kicked off the Mueller team.  Coincidence? Dunno. Maybe.

Again, don’t get so stuck looking at the granules moving at your feet that you fail to notice the entire landscape around you is shifting.

CTH has already opened the portal a little further, and faster, than some would be comfortable with. It is not our intention to undermine the best round-up of usurpers in history; but rather our ongoing CTH effort is to remind everyone they are living inside history as it is being made. Look around, this is exciting and phenomenal stuff.

He continues later in his article:

Quote:As it stands right now, President Trump’s attorney’s are scheduled to meet with Special Counsel Robert Mueller next week.  Against the backdrop of the ongoing Inspector General releases -the real investigative risk to the FBI scheme- Special Counsel Mueller has substantially lost footing, and his entire investigation is losing credibility.  This should not come as a surprise.  After all, there is no ‘there’ there, on the original false intent.

The unethical method used by Mueller’s investigators to retrieve emails from within the transition team also includes protected and privileged information; Robert Mueller has already conceded this was ‘inappropriate’, and only further diminishes his investigation.

Mueller is on his heels as the result of his team’s action; and next week he’s meeting with Trump lawyers presumably to justify/discuss continuance of an investigation that has nothing to do with discovering the Vast Russian Election Conspiracy; because there was no vast Russian election conspiracy.

Remember, everything you just read, President Donald Trump already knows.

Oh, this is just so juicy, I can't stop reading everything that comes out about this investigation.  This is like reading a first class "WhoDoneIt" adventure novel.    S15
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#5
Fortunately, there are some honest Leftists.

'The Nation' Writer on Russia 'Hacking': 'I’ve Never Seen Media Malpractice Like This'

Scholar: Assault on Trump is greatest threat to our country





Also, even if the Whores refuse to cover this fiasco, the average person, who goes to the grocery stores, Target, WalMart, etc, will be able to learn about what is going on, just by reading the tabloids.

[Image: ssu8ojqydd401.jpg]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#6
Gregg Jarrett: Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Huma Abedin Should Be Worried of Impending Prosecution


___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#7
Here's this from Axios: Muddying Mueller: Trump allies say strategy working

Quote:President Trump said yesterday "No, I'm not" when asked if he's considering firing Special Counsel Bob Mueller. Truth is, his high-level Republican allies don't think he will need to.

Be smart: The Trump lawyers' strategy is to cooperate with Mueller on the inside game. The outside chorus tries to rough up Mueller, in case his findings are trouble for POTUS.

- The rising conservative drumbeat to discredit the investigation and the investigators is gaining GOP converts.

- Sen. John Cornyn (Texas), the chamber's #2 Republican, said on ABC yesterday that it would be "a mistake" to fire the special counsel. But Cornyn tweeted a day earlier: "Mueller needs to clean house of partisans."

- Trump said yesterday when asked about the tens of thousandsof transition emails Mueller had obtained from the GSA, which ran the server: "Not looking good. It's not looking good. It's quite sad to see that. My people are very upset about it. ... A lot of lawyers thought that was pretty sad."

- A source close to the White House said: "You're starting to win over mainstream conservatives to the backlash over overreach."

- The source said that Trump, not known for patience, has attacked the investigation but mostly resisted personalizing attacks on Mueller. One sign: Trump isn't calling Mueller by a demeaning nickname.

The N.Y. Times' Michael Schmidt reports that "as the investigation has reached deeper into Mr. Trump's inner circle, ... Trump's lawyers and supporters have significantly increased their attacks on Mr. Mueller":

"[T]he F.B.I. has handed them fresh ammunition to claim that the agents investigating the president may be biased."

But, but, but: "Legal experts said there was no indication that Mr. Mueller, who has wide power to obtain documents through written requests, subpoenas and search warrants, improperly obtained the transition emails."

Fox News' Jesse Watters (one of the 45 Twitter accounts Trump follows) used the onscreen headline "A COUP IN AMERICA?" this weekend as he decried what he called "smoking-gun evidence" the probe of Trump is tainted:

Watters: "Is the FBI part of the resistance? It's like the FBI had Michael Moore investigating the president of the United States. ... The investigation into Donald Trump's campaign has been crooked from the jump."

CNN's Brian Stelter dissects the "War on Mueller" feedback loop: "The right-wing commentary and President Trump's criticism of the FBI are part of a vicious circle. The TV hosts encourage Trump, then Trump supplies sound bites for their shows, and then the hosts are even more emboldened."
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#8
Quote:BOOM! CHRONOLOGICAL PROOF CNN TIPPED OFF AHEAD OF ROGER STONE ARREST Documents expose Mueller team’s collusion with CNN  

The lawyer representing political operative Roger Stone claims metadata contained in his indictment proves CNN received an FBI tip ahead of his arrest.
In particular, according to Stone’s attorney Grant Smith, one day prior to Stone’s arrest CNN had obtained the original copy of the indictment before it was submitted to PACER, a database allowing public access to electronic copies of court records.
Explaining how the metadata exposes CNN, Smith writes, “It is unknown how CNN had obtained a copy of a sealed indictment without a PACER filing header. Additionally, the metadata of the document sent to me, also attached, indicates that the author was ‘AAW’ and that it was created and modified on 1/23/19 at 11:04 pm using Acrobat PDF Maker for Word, a full day before it was filed with the Court under seal.”


An FBI tactical unit armed with automatic weapons arrests an old man with no history of violence. It was obvious from the outset that Mueller's team tipped off CNN.
The true purpose of democracy is not to select the best leaders — a clearly debatable obligation — but to facilitate the prompt and peaceful removal of obviously bad ones. 
Reply
#9
Quote:https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/02...nt-to-cnn/  

A court filing from Roger Stone’s attorneys documents how CNN was in possession of a sealed indictment long before the court ordered it to be released.

For weeks, we have been hearing CNN claim again and again that their presence at Stone’s home ahead of the FBI’s pre-dawn raid was a combination of “luck” and good reporting. They have since built on that fairy-tale, describing their propagandist filming of Stone’s arrest the result of watching “unusual grand jury activity” in the days leading up to January 25th.

Someone should lose his or her job over this or perhaps even go to jail.
The true purpose of democracy is not to select the best leaders — a clearly debatable obligation — but to facilitate the prompt and peaceful removal of obviously bad ones. 
Reply
#10
McCabe Wrote:there were meetings at the Justice Department about whether the vice president and Cabinet members could be gathered to remove Trump under the Constitution’s 25th Amendment
link
Reply
#11
There's a good number of people who we Know committed felonies, many of them provable.  And this goes all the way up to MacDaddy himself.  

My big question is "When are we going to see arrests, and people put behind bars?  I am so Pissed over all this fiasco that I almost want to shoot somebody.   I'll tell you this: If nothing much comes out of all this, millions upon millions of citizens are going to be screaming for a revolution to break out.  We Want Justice, G-dDammit!

I Expect Heads To Roll here, and I'm not going to be satisfied with a bunch of excuses from either of those two totally worthless parties.  Again, if an Impactor entered the atmosphere and hit DC, I would be the first one in my neighborhood to get out in the front street and dance a jig.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#12
Quote: I am so Pissed over all this fiasco that I almost want to shoot somebody.

Not a good idea, and it is pointless to expect justice from the Entity. If this issue is important, move to the Free World, like Monica Witt did.
Sodomia delenda est

Reply
#13
(02-14-2019, 09:18 PM)mv Wrote:
Quote: I am so Pissed over all this fiasco that I almost want to shoot somebody.  

Not a good idea, and it is pointless to expect justice from the Entity. If this issue is important, move to the Free World, like Monica Witt did.

Note the word "almost" in my statement.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#14
Oh yes, indeed! Then no problem, justice is really not essential. Most people do/did just fine in KSA or Zimbabwe. Heck, most people did just fine in Nazi Germany....except for the allies bombings, of course.

Incidentally, the current justice system in the US seems to be modeled after the Soviet Union of late 1920s-early 1930s. The same emphasis on the admission of guilt as we see with Manafort, Cohen, etc was typical in the USSR at that time, sentences were generally comparable, and the idea of these shows too: to get the low-level associates first as to prepare the moves against the real targets. Of course USSR quickly evolved to the stage where sentences were not light anymore.... perhaps in a couple of years here?
Reply
#15
According to the video posted above by JohnL, it's the neocons who are behind the investigation.
I mean those who are obsessed with the evil USSR and regret the Cold War is no more.

Of course the democrats use it against Trump, just as you do against Hillary. (I mean "you"; you, on this forum). Accusing him of everything.

Anyway Trump will get his Peace Nobel Prize.

It's so obvious, nobody even mentions it in the news...
Reply
#16
(02-19-2019, 04:08 PM)Fredledingue Wrote: ...
Anyway Trump will get his Peace Nobel Prize.

It's so obvious, nobody even mentions it in the news...

The Nobel committee has a rule that no one who sponsors anyone for a Peace Prize can be confirmed for 50 years. Japan's Prime Minister gave Trump a letter saying that he did. Of course the anti-Trump media with no proof said Trump suggested doing so. I guess we have another 36 years to find out how Obama got a Seinfeld-Nobel Prize for nothing.

Rush was brilliant today analyzing current Mueller news. The Deep State idiots have initiated the idea that the Mueller report will say Trump was innocent of collusion because he was an unwitting dupe of Putin, and is too stupid to know he was used. Rush says that even though the Anti-Trumpers have nothing provable against him, they will still go for the throat based on him not being an experienced politician. Rush says this does two things: allows them to continue their attacks on Trump, and also inform all other outsiders that encroaching on their bailiwick will not be allowed. Rush also says there is a label for this: McCarthyism. Although McCarthy was proved correct on his allegations against Leftists, the media still use him as anathema. Now the Left is doing it and the media is lock-step with them.
Reply
#17
I was reading on a paper lately that this obsession with "russian collusion" will backfire with democrats voters. Poeple are fed up it seems and want politicians to talk about concrete things instead of this.

It's possible that there were sympathy between Putin and Trump at some point, and that the former had offered help in providing democrat e-mails, trolling the net and so on. Yet talking about a conspiracy to put Trump at the WH is ridiculously exagerating.

The truth is that about every Trump's associate have been convicted of fraud. (Trump himself is protected by presidential immunity). But that's not a reason for impeachement.
Reply
#18
What's most interesting Fred, is that Mueller has had a good two years to root around, along with his many Democrat "Anti-Trump" prosecutors, and has actually found nothing to hang over Trump's head. However, in the acts of sticking their noses into every type of actions by others, they have come up with other's naughty deeds. I wonder how many Comrade Mueller has committed over the years? Perhaps there should be a Special Prosecutor to investigate the Special Prosecutor.

I wonder how much criminal behavior one must commit in order to prosecute other's criminal behavior.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply
#19
What are the odds he nails Hillary?
The true purpose of democracy is not to select the best leaders — a clearly debatable obligation — but to facilitate the prompt and peaceful removal of obviously bad ones. 
Reply
#20
(03-10-2019, 11:36 PM)Canuknucklehead Wrote: What are the odds he nails Hillary?

If he does, I'll be so surprised that I may fall out of my chair. Shock
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
--- SCHiST Happens! ---
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Coming NSA Investigation and how It Will Derail The Dems John L 0 576 02-03-2006, 02:46 PM
Last Post: John L

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)