Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Obama Spying Scandal
#1
Something's happened to the thread that discusses the electronic surveillance issue.  Here's what I was going to post, for those who refuse to believe Trump was being spied on by MacDaddy's people.

Sean Spicer Spends 10 Minutes Reading Every Wiretap News Story That Ever Was Published. ABC Jonathan Karl Has His Blinder On.

Sean Spicer HEATED argument with ABC Jonathan Karl on Trump Wiretap Claim




And Judge Napolitano, who's word I will take over EVERYONE ELSE, has this to say about electronic surveillance.
Napolitano: Was candidate Trump spied on?




And the Judge has the best take on all this.  
Did the Obama administration use British intel to wiretap Trump?




As he states below, our NSA records ALL land and wireless conversations, which are saved in digital.  Thus it is easy to find anything that someone like Trump stated.  

But get this: the US also shares ALL of this data with the Brits for them to use.  Now, in order for the government to have "Plausible Deniability,  they could go to their friendly Brits and get them to hand over these transcripts to them.  Then they can state under oath that they did not get this information from the NSA.  In fact, they got it from the Brits in a round-about manner.  

This is clearly Unconstitutional as the Judge says.  And all of this Post 9/11 loss of liberties should be done away with.  And it all began with Junior and that Gawd Awful Patriot Act.  Its Unconstitutional and should be thrown in the trash, because too many people are clearly abusing it.  And the citizenry is the injured party here.  That means you and me and everybody.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - David Horowitz

Reply
#2
More concerning original wiretap lie:

http://www.businessinsider.com/senate-in...ing-2017-3

Concerning the judge's claims:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/03/...retapping/

http://www.businessinsider.com/shepard-s...chq-2017-3

http://fox6now.com/2017/03/19/who-were-f...-his-side/

In other words, delusional stupidity based on a blogger's commentary who worked for the CIA 30 years ago.

Great source.

Before the year is out, it will be of interest to me to see if any of you Trump people admit he's mentally unbalanced and wouldn't know the truth if Jesus stood in front of him and introduced Himself.
Reply
#3
I just changed the name of this thread to "The Obama Spying Scandal", because I really believe this scandal has long legs, and will almost certainly play hell on Obama, his legacy, and the legal implications of his cabinet.  This could be Huge!

I don't normally listen to Hannity, but I got lazy today and didn't remove my headphones at 3PM.  Anyway, it has been reported that even he too was being spied upon by the WH.  He is livid and is seriously talking about suing the living hell out of every possible guilty party.  

[Image: bc1e5160189597c609e7c78df8c30b0c783857f7...=800&h=429]
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - David Horowitz

Reply
#4
Most of us never pay attention to Maxine Waters, but like other Jackasses in the know, she had inside scoop on all this. AND she even talked about it publicly. We just never took it all that seriously.

Maxine Waters explained how Obama's secret database will be used


___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - David Horowitz

Reply
#5
Quote:First I was all like ... there was no way that Obama was spying on the Trump campaign ... that's BS man ...
But then I was all like ... Rice was just doing her job man ...


[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRYGEVJFLkwfKA6p5fHXAG...ObzKxsxoSh]

The Bold and the Vacuous...

[Image: evelyn-farkas.jpg?w=640]

[Image: Susan-Rice-PBS-I-Know-Noting-About-Nunes...20x436.jpg]

[Image: latest?cb=20120220050805]
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard."
-- Henry Mencken
Reply
#6
Keep the Pressure coming Baby!

Susan Rice’s White House Unmasking: A Watergate-style Scandal. Her interest was not in national security but to advance the political interests of the Democratic party MacDaddy.

Quote:The thing to bear in mind is that the White House does not do investigations. Not criminal investigations, not intelligence investigations. Remember that.

Why is that so important in the context of explosive revelations that Susan Rice, President Obama’s national-security adviser, confidant, and chief dissembler, called for the “unmasking” of Trump campaign and transition officials whose identities and communications were captured in the collection of U.S. intelligence on foreign targets?

Because we’ve been told for weeks that any unmasking of people in Trump’s circle that may have occurred had two innocent explanations: (1) the FBI’s investigation of Russian meddling in the election and (2) the need to know, for purposes of understanding the communications of foreign intelligence targets, the identities of Americans incidentally intercepted or mentioned. The unmasking, Obama apologists insist, had nothing to do with targeting Trump or his people.

That won’t wash.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - David Horowitz

Reply
#7
Dana Loesch on Susan Rice, Gorsuch vote


___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - David Horowitz

Reply
#8
If you want to become cross-eyed, go to Snopes to read how Evelyn Farkas is a Saint and all reports to the contrary are just wishful thinking. I'm waiting for their report on Susan Rice. I wonder if the Mikkelsons are aware of how they are diminishing their brand?
Reply
#9
The NSA spies on all humanity that is involved in electronic communications, that has to include Trump and incidentally Obama. If you guys support the US surveillance of all humanity, why is this either surprising or nefarious?

The next POTUS will have access to the same stuff or even more by then.

The sole thing above that is nefarious(from the perspective of you security state supporters) if it is accurate is the "unmasking" of incidental names.
Reply
#10
(04-05-2017, 09:12 PM)Palladin Wrote: The NSA spies on all humanity that is involved in electronic communications, that has to include Trump and incidentally Obama. If you guys support the US surveillance of all humanity, why is this either surprising or nefarious?

The next POTUS will have access to the same stuff or even more by then.

The sole thing above that is nefarious(from the perspective of you security state supporters) if it is accurate is the "unmasking" of incidental names.

There are strict guidelines the NSA has to follow, the Democrats were so confident Hillary was gong to win they became careless. Obama should have asked fellow progressive Trudeau to have Canada's CSE to the spying on Trump and company.
'It's not who votes that matters, it's who counts the votes'  |  György Schwartz, Budapest, Hungary
Reply
#11
(04-05-2017, 10:37 PM)WarBicycle Wrote:
(04-05-2017, 09:12 PM)Palladin Wrote: The NSA spies on all humanity that is involved in electronic communications, that has to include Trump and incidentally Obama. If you guys support the US surveillance of all humanity, why is this either surprising or nefarious?

The next POTUS will have access to the same stuff or even more by then.

The sole thing above that is nefarious(from the perspective of you security state supporters) if it is accurate is the "unmasking" of incidental names.

There are strict guidelines the NSA has to follow, the Democrats were so confident Hillary was gong to win they became careless. Obama should have asked fellow progressive Trudeau to have Canada's CSE to the spying on Trump and company.

He probably would have, if he didn't have someone inside the British system already.  I think one of the articles I linked to discussed how the US shared their intel with the Brits.  So instead of having to go through the system, all his cronies had to do was just get the same thing from a friendly Brit.   This bypassed official channels and left no paper trail.

The Judge brought that up and was suspended by FNC indefinitely.  But that 'indefinitely' lasted just two days, and he was back on the job.  Either there was tremendous outrage over the suspension, or they discovered the Judge was correct.  Most likely both. I even wrote Fox and complained about what they did to the Judge.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
"INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - David Horowitz

Reply
#12
Echelon is an international endeavor which, I believe, mostly is in Iceland or Greenland. This place records everything, and the participating involved nations use algorithms to pull data that use keywords or targeted individuals. This is probably why Naploetano said The British may have intercepted some things for Obama. The recording is baked in - it is the getting it out that is restricted or should be.
Reply
#13
There is effectively almost no control over the NSA. The FISA court almost never says no and to be honest, no one except a handful of citizens even knows if it really exists. For example, what are the names of the judges on it?

No one knows except them if they exist and probably 50 other people.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  OBAMA CHEATING SCANDAL WarBicycle 5 622 05-01-2010, 05:05 PM
Last Post: jt

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)