AI-Jane Political, And Economic Forums

Full Version: Dutch Pedophiles to Launch Their own Party
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
This is surprising,................well, maybe not so surprising after all. What do you think?

Quote:Pedophiles to Launch Political Party

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalization of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.

The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its Web site it would be officially registered Wednesday, proclaiming: "We are going to shake The Hague awake!"

The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.

"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad (AD) newspaper.

"We want to make pedophilia the subject of discussion," he said, adding the subject had been a taboo since the 1996 Marc Dutroux child abuse scandal in neighboring Belgium.

"We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals," Van den Berg told Reuters.
Quote:Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalization of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.

I hope the outrage is big enough to get these sick people permanently admitted to an insane asylum.
When I see that occuring in Holland, I will KNOW that they are getting serious about improving the morals foundations there.
Predicted it. Beastiality people are next.
Let's all watch as Shariah Law encounters Pederasts (who are not Muslim.) Do they merge or do they brawl? Either way it will define who they are.
How is this party different from any other party in Holland?
Isn't the Netherlands one of those countries with a zillion political parties?
I would bet this one isn't anywhere the most wacky.
Its called freedom and democracy, folks, in truly free countries, all people have the right to make their voices heard and make appeals for their issues.
Doesn't mean they will win, but there are several countries with lower age of consent ages than 16, including some US states.
Yeah but you see the issue TQ is not whether they should be banned from politics. No one here has advocated that. It just shows you the moral standards of the left wing. Although child abuse is an issue in this country the pedophiles of our society know better than to try and become an official party.

NAMBLA knows better than to put themselves on the ballot. They usually just send their checks to the DNC.
They don't really stand a chance to win a seat, I guess they just sought some publicity.

Thaiquila Wrote:Isn't the Netherlands one of those countries with a zillion political parties?

Approximately 50, but most don't seem very serious and usually only 8 of them win any seats (1 seat = ~65,000 votes).
Thaiquila Wrote:Isn't the Netherlands one of those countries with a zillion political parties?
I would bet this one isn't anywhere the most wacky.
Its called freedom and democracy, folks, in truly free countries, all people have the right to make their voices heard and make appeals for their issues.
Doesn't mean they will win, but there are several countries with lower age of consent ages than 16, including some US states.

You may label it democracy. I, however, shall label it "political Anarchy".
John L Wrote:
Thaiquila Wrote:Isn't the Netherlands one of those countries with a zillion political parties?
I would bet this one isn't anywhere the most wacky.
Its called freedom and democracy, folks, in truly free countries, all people have the right to make their voices heard and make appeals for their issues.
Doesn't mean they will win, but there are several countries with lower age of consent ages than 16, including some US states.

You may label it democracy. I, however, shall label it "political Anarchy".
There is no anarchy here. They are voicing their opinions publicly in a free society. People are discussing it and ignoring them. Why are you being so emotional about this? You accuse the left of being emotional, here it is you guys being knee jerk. There is no anarchy here.
Thaq,

Come on dude,we're discussing PEDOPHILES here. Is there NOTHING that you see as inappropriate for positive public debate?
No, he's ample evidence of those who have been corrupted by the Left defining deviancy down. Clueless.
Palladin Wrote:Thaq,

Come on dude,we're discussing PEDOPHILES here. Is there NOTHING that you see as inappropriate for positive public debate?
There is still a Nazi party. It is legal, yes?
No, it is not legal in Germany.
Thaq,

I said POSITIVE PUBLIC DEBATE. It is outrageous that there are human pedophiles. It is outrageous they seek to have a political position.

It is not acceptable,a man admits he is a pedophile and he should be jailed.

If you think a man who wants to have sex with a child is not a criminal,we share NOTHING beyond we're both humans.
Palladin Wrote:Thaq,

I said POSITIVE PUBLIC DEBATE. It is outrageous that there are human pedophiles. It is outrageous they seek to have a political position.

It is not acceptable,a man admits he is a pedophile and he should be jailed.

If you think a man who wants to have sex with a child is not a criminal,we share NOTHING beyond we're both humans.
Speech isn't crime. Actions are crimes. Pretty basic and obvious that.
No. Speech can be a crime. It is not a crime to shout "fire" in a crowded movie theater if there is a fire - but if someone yells "Fire!" when there is no fire, in order to get his jollies out of seeing people trampled to death - then that person can be tried for murder. How is that different from arguing that child molestors should be allowed to abuse children? It is done... and the covering distasteful debate can only serve to facilitate the perversion.
WmLambert Wrote:No. Speech can be a crime. It is not a crime to shout "fire" in a crowded movie theater if there is a fire - but if someone yells "Fire!" when there is no fire, in order to get his jollies out of seeing people trampled to death - then that person can be tried for murder. How is that different from arguing that child molestors should be allowed to abuse children? It is done... and the covering distasteful debate can only serve to facilitate the perversion.
Typical red baiting. You have no evidence of that.
It is always easy to show how normal and superior you are by attacking the most hated group of people in society. Takes a lot of balls!
Not,
I am the one with the balls showing how easy and cowardly that is.
Red Baiting? Get a dictionary and learn a working vocabulary.

Those who wish to be a part of this nasty nascent party are child molesters and sexual abusers, or enablers of child molesters and sexual abusers. By definition.

Starting a political party, no matter how stupid, is only the right of legal citizens. Criminals can only become a part of the system by esposing a legal agenda. Anyone who urges criminal action or abets it is an accessory to the crime - even if the crime is avoided.

If you doubt this, try to hire an undercover policeman posing as a contract killer to murder someone. It is likely the policeman will not follow through with the murder, but you will go to prison.
Pages: 1 2 3